Monday, November 18, 2013

German Identity Formation and Its Evolution

          When one asks a German about their feelings toward their country and their people, one will often gather that Germans take a great deal of pride in being from Germany and being part of the German community. And to us, that might seem funny. The most prevalent impressions of Germans among Americans is the idea that Germany is just a country where everyone drinks copious amounts of beer and gets drunk all the time, as well as a country full of Nazis. But when everyone else thinks of America, they think of people who love having guns, love to be gluttons, refuse to share their wealth and think that everything revolves around them. No wonder they think it’s strange when we take pride in our country. But what we must understand is why they take great pride in their own country.

           Let’s start at the beginning of World War I. At this point, Germany believed that it was an unstoppable world power. The people were prideful to the point of being foolish. On page 191 of Hagen Schulze’s Germany: A New History, Kaiser Wilhelm II is quoted on August 4th, 1914, saying “I do not recognize parties any longer, I recognize only Germans.”
http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/PA-1142522.jpg
German soldiers parading to war while civilians cheered them onward.
The text then goes on to say that Wilhelm’s statement “helps to explain the general public’s jubilation at the outbreak of the First World War in Germany…” and that this jubilation “was not unlike the demonstrations of mass enthusiasm in London, Paris and St. Petersburg.” The Germans not only supported their soldiers in their upcoming efforts, but they believed that they could not be defeated. However, by July 17
th, 1917, the majority in the German Parliament declared itself in favor of a peace treaty. By November 11th, 1918, Germany had officially signed the armistice that ended World War I. Unfortunately the damage of the war was too severe for the people to have any sort of sympathy towards the government. They may have ended World War I, but they could not avoid starting a civil war.

            Eventually, after years of political unrest within Germany, the economy began to flourish. So why was there still a lack of support for the new government? The brutal truth was that the economy was not flourishing in the eyes of those who remembered life before the war. On page 219, Schulze explains how people noticed that the best year for the economy fell far short of the mark set by even the worst years preceding the war. How could this be? The Germans grew curious and began to question the leadership of their government.

            Around this time, The NSDAP (more “affectionately” known now as the Nazi party) came to power in the Government, while all efforts at democracy began to fail. This soon led to Hitler’s rise to power and a sense of false hope for the populace, as democracy around Europe was falling apart and dictatorships gave off a glimmer of hope.
Images taken from Google Images
Dictatorships seemed all the rage in 1930's Europe. Here are
the three most prominent faces of European dictatorships.

            Hitler’s coming to power was the beginning of a very different identity for the Germans. Many Germans publicly supported the new government and took pride in become such a pure and superior nation (the rise of the Aryan race), but within the privacy of their own homes and private conversations, shared their true feelings of opposition. A fair comparison could be made between the new Nazi government and the book, 1984, known most popularly by its concept of a powerful ruler, known as “Big Brother,” capable of hearing and seeing everything that went on within the boundaries of the country, as well as eliminating all of those who were deemed threats to the goals of the state (i.e. political opponents). As this blind sense of national pride came about, World War II began and Hitler’s government soon fell, along with the façade put up by the Germans who were not targeted by the state. 

             After watching their country suffer the harsh consequences of a loss in such brutal wars as both World Wars, the German nation began to see that it could no longer blindly follow and support a government of totalitarian control, such as the Nazi government or the days of the Kaiser. Germany would need to develop a government based on democracy. Germany would need to refrain from giving one person so much control over the country. Germany would need to think more critically before taking such drastic actions as fighting a war in which they cannot afford to be a participant. Most importantly, though, the people of Germany would need to take pride in who they were now, regardless of where the country had been before or where the country was headed.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Power Struggle (10/23)

The Power Struggle of the Kingdoms of Saxony and Prussia

In our everyday life, we can find many occasions where there is resistance to the unification of two or more separate entities to create one large, powerful unit. One of the least famous instances of this was the creation of the Steagles during World War II. The Steelers and Eagles, neither having enough players to field separate teams because of the war, combined to play a single NFL season together. At first, there was very strong opposition to this idea. Players, fans and even coaches tried to resist and made every effort to tear the team apart, at first. However, they finally caved a little and allowed for this unification to take place. This truly was a struggle of power, worrying that the other team would try to overpower the other if they were combined.

When we look at the creation of the German nation, we can see this same issue of a power struggle come to being. There were two extremely powerful kingdoms of Prussia and Saxony were in competition and constantly trying to overpower, overthrow and annex the other. Neither kingdom was willing to give up their name or their right to power. They each felt the other should become part of their kingdom. Neither even considered what could happen if they merged to create a larger, more powerful nation, with neither nation belonging to the other, but both belonging to this new entity. In the end, Prussia annexed Saxony into its kingdom just shortly before the unification of the German nation in 1871.

The evolution of German identity is quite unique. To the outside world, I feel as though Germans have a great pride in being Germany. This is clear as day when watching the Olympics or the World Cup. However, within their own nation, Germans take great pride in being from their own region. This is similar to the identity of Americans. Americans take great pride in being a citizen of this country, but they also take pride in being from their respective state, town, etc. What makes the German identity so unique is that they still identify with the regions that were in existence long before the unification in 1871. Germans will take great pride in being from the Bavarian Alps or the Northeastern Sea Platte more so than they might in being from the German state of Bavaria or Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.

Is it fair for us to assume that everything would have worked out perfectly had the two kingdoms been willing to work together to create a supreme kingdom and, from there, a unified German nation? Absolutely not. We cannot rightly assume anything on the basis that, after their struggle, things ended up falling into place. However, we can rightly assume that, as with their struggle to gain the dominant position over the other, there would be unique struggles and successes along the way. But how different would Germany have been? How would this have affected the development of the language and the culture? Would we still be able to find the unique culture and history of each region today? How would this have affected the actions of national leaders leading up to some of the most monumental moments in the country's history, such as World War I, the third Reich and World War II or the separation of East and West Germanys and the Cold War? These are questions for us to ponder, to study, to use as tools for discussion and to think about critically.

Monday, September 16, 2013

Berliner Geschichte (9/16)

Battle of Berlin

The battle of Berlin was essentially the beginning of the end of the european campaign of World War II. Led by the Soviet Union, the battle of Berlin was the most consequential defeat suffered by the Nazi forces, during which their leaders, Adolf Hitler and Josef Goebbels, committed suicide. The battle raged from April 20th, 1945 to May 2nd, 1945. The Soviets had encircled the city of Berlin with three fronts, using one to push in from the south, while a second shelled the city center and the third overtook the Nazi forces to the north. While many of the soldiers surrendered on the 2nd of May, fighting continued in small pockets until the end of the european campaign a week later (May 8th/9th). Interestingly enough, some of the fighting that continued was from Nazi troops fighting westward in order to surrender to the less brutal Western Allies instead of the feared Soviet forces. As a sign of victory, the Soviet Union placed their flag upon the roof of the Reichstag (below), the main political building of Berlin and one of the more significant symbols of the Third Reich.
http://olive-drab.com/images/berlin_victory_1945_375.jpg













Fall of the Berlin Wall

On August 12th, 1961, citizens of East Berlin and West Berlin went to sleep, thinking they would be able to see their friends and family the next day. Had they known what would take place that next morning, it is hard to believe they would not have run away or moved together. On August 13th, 1961, the communistic East Germany government built a wall to divide their communist society from the western-influenced society of West Germany and West Berlin. The Berlin Wall was arguably the most iconic symbol of communism and its oppressive reign over many nations of eastern Europe and Asia. Over the next 28 years, numerous East Berlin citizens would attempt to sneak across. Few would succeed. Most would die trying. However, this would all change on November 9th, 1989. The East Germany government announced that it would allow citizens to freely visit West Berlin. Many climbed the wall and began to tear it down (below), a task that would be completed before the end of 1990. The fall of the Berlin Wall not only marked the end of oppression for East Germans, but also the end of the Cold War and the communist hold on Europe and most of Asia.
http://www.thefinestwriter.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/the-most-memorable-photos-of-the-fall-of-berlin-the-wall-4.jpg


2006 FIFA World Cup Finals

It was July 9th, 2006. For the last month or so, 32 soccer teams representing 32 countries worked toward the dream of winning the World Cup. Half would be eliminated after the first three games on their schedules. On that day, in Berlin's Olympiastadion [Olympic Stadium] (below), only two teams would find their dreams 90 minutes away. This time, they were the national teams of Italy and France. After two early goals (9' by France's Zinedine Zidane, 17' by Italy's Marco Materazzi) were scored, the ball was knocked back and forth by the two teams in a very evenly contested match-up. As the game progressed, it became clear the game may very well enter extra time. Delaying their dreams by another 30 minutes for the extra time, France and Italy continued to battle. After a game and dream-saving stop by Italy's goalkeeper, Gianluigi Buffon, anxiety began to set in on the players and tempers were flaring. Both sides had little patience for anything but victory. This led to one of the more memorable moments from the 2006 World Cup. Zidane was being covered by Materazzi towards the end of extra time and took the opportunity to say a few words to Materazzi. However, Materazzi did not appreciate what was being said and decided to headbutt Zidane in the chest in retaliation with the ball nowhere in their vacinity. This was an off-the-ball incident and led to Materazzi's immediate ejection. When asked later what led him to take such action, Materazzi explained to the media that Zidane was speaking rudely of his mother and Materazzi was greatly offended. Shortly after, extra time ended and the fate of the World Cup fell to a penalty shoot-out. Winning 5-3, Italy took home their first title since beating West Germany in the 1982 World Cup.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/Olympicstadium2.jpg/320px-Olympicstadium2.jpg


To have the 2006 World Cup Finals hosted in Berlin was monumental, as it was the first time the reunited nation had hosted a large-scale international event of this magnitude. In addition, it was the first time since Hitler's reign that Berlin itself had played host to an event of that magnitude. It was not the first event hosted in Germany since the 1972 Munich Olympics, during which Palestinian terrorists took 11 Israeli athlete hostage, eventually killing them and a German police officer. Munich hosted the 1974 World Cup Finals, but security at the 2006 Finals was most likely under less scrutiny than the 1974 Finals.



I anxiously await my second trip to Germany and all of the amazing opportunities I will have over there to learn and grow as a student, person and world traveler, but also the opportunities I will have over there to just enjoy everything Germany has to offer.

Monday, September 9, 2013

Martin Luther: Von Märtyrer zu Wahnsinn (9/9)

Dieser Eintrag wird ein bißchen Deutsch und Englisch haben.

Wenn man über Martin Luther spricht, spricht man meistens über die 95 Thesen. Die 95 Thesen waren sehr wichtig, aber es hat einen anderen Teil von Martin Luther gegeben.

Vielleicht sagt man, dass Luther hat den Normalbürger vertreten. Er hat gesagt, dass man für Verzeihung bezahlen musste. Die Menschen haben einen Verfechter bekommen. Luther hat gesagt, dass man konnte das ewige Leben bekommen. Man musste nur an Gott glauben. Der Papst mochte das total nicht. Luther hat Freiheit vertreten und hat die Normalbürgers Macht und Hoffnung gegeben.

http://imgc.allpostersimages.com/images/P-473-488-90/13/1347/8TES000Z/posters/martin-luther-in-front-of-charles-v-1500-58-at-the-diet-of-worms-16th-april-1521.jpg
Martin Luther spoke out against the Diet of Worms, saying he would stand be his beliefs with God's help.

Für moderne Deutschland, war Luther ein Symbol. Er war ein Symbol, dass Menschen konnte sich gegen Schinders behaupten. Er war ein Symbol für Gleichberechtigung. Er war ein Symbol für Meinungsfreiheit. Er war wirklich ein Revolutionär.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguk2BppNU42KL27g3a7cdkL1FCcW60kpy-iVFiseGCbQdNPhtsw5dSHSIW_a16UOvcoAWoHJ9EanvTvA9yc2sZHbqXwOvi0R2fzQa2QJmtGe5PYpFOUmrRR84MeMnJuk7PehKHr2ZopHE/s640/aa+--+95theses.jpg

Die 95 Thesen, die Martin Luther geschrieben hat, wurden als Propaganda gesehen.















Wenn Martin Luther für die Normalbürgers ist, warum hat er gesagt, dass die Kleinbauern der Teufel waren? Luther hat auch gepredigt, dass der Kleinbauer ist von dem Teufel gekommen und dass man den Kleinbauer tötet sollte. Dieser Unterricht ist gegen die Normalbürgers gegangen. Vielleicht war Luther wie den ersten deutscher Politiker. Er hat etwas gesagt, und dann hat er etwas total anders gemacht.

Martin Luther also spoke out against the Jews. He said they should not be trusted and that they were wrong in their ways and beliefs. 400 years later, another man would come along and proclaim similar beliefs. While the german people are not all like Luther and Hitler, this does make for an interesting trend. Luther was a political revolutionary for speaking out against the Pope, making the opposing side of the conflict look as though they were not trying to help the people. He also was a revolutionary for publicizing such radical beliefs. It could also be argued that the way he conveyed himself to people at one moment and then turned against them could make him a revolutionary for modern day political tactics.

As it is with most people who have contributed in such a positive manner to society, while also contributing in a way that most would argue as a negative manner, it should be the positives that are focused on at the end of the day. The power and ideas of free speech and religion that Luther instilled in the common people is priceless and the positive use of such power and freedoms seen today in the german population is amazing and a model for everyone to look to.
http://static0.demotix.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/a_scale_large/2000-9/photos/1367686080-peace-activists-dirupt-the-german-defence-minister-thomas-de-maizire_2021609.jpg
German activisits speaking out against the War in Afghanistan because they believe it is wrong.

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

Die 95 Thesen von Martin Luther (9/3)

1517 hat Martin Luther die 95 Thesen geschrieben. Die Thesen, die seine Gedanken über Religion und die Ausübungen des Papstes waren, waren für die Periode sehr radikal. Luther, der ein Mönch war, hat gedacht, dass man sollte für Verzeihung nicht bezahlen. Er hat geglaubt, dass Gott alles verzeiht und dass man sein Geld nicht geben muss, um seine Sünden zu bereuen. Als der Papst die Thesen gehört hat, wurde er verärgert.
http://www.biography.com/imported/images/Biography/Images/Profiles/L/Martin-Luther-9389283-1-402.jpg
Martin Luther, der ein M
önch war, hat in den 95 Thesen gegen den Papst ausgesprochen.












Wenn man nach diesen Überzeugungen denkt, verwert man, dass was Luther glaubt. John 3:16 sagt, „Also hat Gott die Welt geliebt, daß er seinen eingeborenen Sohn gab, auf daß alle, die an ihn glauben, nicht verloren werden, sondern das ewige Leben haben.“ Das meint, dass wir verzeiht sind! Jesus ist für uns gestorben. Er hat sein Leben gegeben, um unsere Schulden zu verzeihen. Wir müssen dem Papst kein Geld geben.

Der Papst hat die Thesen gehört und wollte Martin Luther abbitten. Martin Luther hat sich geweigert abzubitten. Es wurde angeordnet, dass Luther verbannt wurde.

Rosa Parks ist aber so gleich wie Luther. Am 1. Dezember, 1955 wurde Frau Parks verhaften. Sie hat sich geweigert, ihren Platz aufzugeben. Die Abteilung, die für die Weißers war, war ganz voll. Der Busfahrer hat Parks geordnet, ihren Platz aufzugeben, aber sie hat „nein“ gesagt und ist da geblieben. Nach dieser Veranstaltung, haben die Afroamerikaner die Busse boykottiert. Diese Veranstaltung hat die Afroamerikaner verärgert und angeregt. Die Veranstaltung war für die Bürgerrechtsbewegung sehr wichtig.

http://www.vibe.com/sites/vibe.com/files/styles/main_image/public/article_images/Vibe-Vixen-Rosa-Parks.jpeg
Rosa Parks, wie Luther, wurde f
ür ihre Überzeugungen verhaftet.

Die 95 Thesen wurde durch Europa verbreitet. Als die Menschen die Thesen gelesen haben, wurden sie verärgert und sie haben den Papst vorausgesehen. Die 95 Thesen ist die Protestantische Reform begonnen.

Heute sind die Deutschen sehr engagiert. Sie protestieren und sprechen über ihre Gedanken. 

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Was werde ich lernen?

Dieser Dezember werde ich nach Berlin und ostzentral Deutschland fliegen. Da bleibe ich für drei Wochen. Ich habe Berlin gewählt, weil ich für Deutschland viele Interesse habe. Ich war einmal in Hessen und ich habe gedacht, dass Deutschland so schön aus sieht. Ich mag das deutsche Essen, die deutsche Kultur und die Deutschen. Ich finde die deutsche Sprache sehr schön und interessant. Es freut mich, dass Deutsch so ähnlich wie Englisch ist. Als ich Deutsch angefangen zu lernen habe, ist mein Englisch so viel besser geworden. Hoffentlich kann ich in Deutschland mein Deutsch verbessern.  

Ich hoffe, dass unter anderem ich mehr über Berliner Graffiti und deutschen Fußball lernen werde.
Ich weiß, dass Berliner Graffiti sehr schön ist. Ich möchte sehen, ob das Graffiti, das auf dem Berliner Mauer ist, auf den zwei Seiten sich unterscheidet. Ich möchte auch wissen, wie das Graffiti sich unterscheidet und warum es sich unterscheidet.

Wann ich in Deutschland bin, möchte ich auch über den deutschen Fußballbund. Ich werde ein Rallprojekt machen, das über die Geschichte von deutschem Fußball sein wird. Ich habe gedacht, dass vielleicht die 1980 WM Deutschland zusammen zu bringen geholfen hat. Ich habe auch gewundert, wie den Champions-League-Finale Deutschland beeinflusst hat. Dieses Jahr war das erste Jahr, dass zwei deutschen Mannschaften im Champions-League-Finale gespielt hat. Dieses Jahr wurde der Champions-League-Finale in London gespielt. England und Deutschland mögen ein ander nicht. Als keine englischen Mannschaften im Finale gespielt hat, waren die Engländer nicht so glücklich.

Ich freue mich auf diese Reise und alles, dass ich lernen kann. Ich hoffe, dass ich über die zwei Sachen, die ich oben geschrieben habe, und so viel mehr lernen kann.

JHart